doctor or astrologer for a disease.

there are many similarities between doctor and an astrologer

1. both think that all diseases can be cured but none of them can treat a single one. 
2. they both diagnose the problem as non of them can cure a single disease with a single pill/act.
3. they both play with human mind, doctors give mind numbing medicine and astrologer give confidence.
4. they both are backed by biggest industries ,(after arms industry), on earth i.e. the pharmaceutical industry and religion. 
5. they both feed upon ignorant people. any class, any religion, any region, any language, etc.
6. they both have their own legality and science associated with them which is enough to befool. 
7. it is age, experience, confidence, fees and the list of visitors, that matters and not the quality of performance in both the cases,
8. almost 90% of Indians are taking pills by doctors, ''openly'', and 90% of Indians are going to an astrologer, ''secretly''.
9. Both play with pocket as doctor prescribe banned medicine and astrologers prescribe gems ,which are not jewelry. 
10. our solar system has sun and planets, which is definitely less complex than bodies of nearly 8 billion people, but ignorant people think that a list of 20 salts or a donation on Saturday can cure all ills.
11. they both provide an easy solution for bigger problems.

differences between doctor and astrologer

1. doctor work mostly in urban area and astrologer work mostly in rural areas. 
2. doctor belongs to the middle class so carries political clout with them, but astrologers perform their task in secret so hardly come in open. 
3. we need doctors for post-mortem and not astrologers.

here the doctor refers an MBBS degree holder, who learn to kill pathogens (virus and bacteria).

the doctors of homeopathy or ayurveda are excluded because they work on principles of rising immunity and cough, vaat and pitt.
also, the astrologer means priest, shaman, medicine man, sorcerer, witch.

So in case of disease go to a doctor, if in India, go to an astrologer also.


I felt this wickedness after i was hospitalized.

sociologists and economists

sociologists talk about social relations which include issues of those people who don't have money such as women, tribals, slaves, etc.
economists know how to met unlimited demands from limited resources. they can tell how to increase profit.

Nowadays economists are gaining but sociologists are receding in terms of recognization.

why economists got more recognization is
1.  they are backed by western developed countries who want to gain profit by international trade. Also, their social structure supports such developments.
2. economic power is very effective in gaining control of world's affairs so developing countries followed their western counterparts.

 this has resulted in getting economic solutions than social solution of issues, for example, global warming.
we know that the best solution for global warming is planting.  economist's solution has been the use of fuel-efficient cars or financial inclusion etc., hardly any mention of plants.  this is because plants have lesser economic value but have higher social value(religion, marriage etc.). So sociologists can give better solutions to global warming.

similarly, sociologist have a better solution than an economist, of issues such as education(for social relation or for economic gain), national security(for residents or for country's wealth), health(for humanity or through modern medicines), etc.

We must also consider that social life has existed since paleolitihic period  and economic life is mainly a result of the industrial revolution.

this shows that human relations have existed for a longer time than the economic relations. And for acknowledging the true potential of human relations we need social intellectuals.
So we must start nobel prize in sociology. 

spiritual quotient

IQ i.e. intelligent quotient is the ability to understand, imagine, or memory related aspects.It is good in passing exams.
EQ i.e. emotional quotient is the ability to manage our emotions, for example, we bring the feelings of office to home and then beat kids for not studying. It is for working socially.

the concept of spiritual quotient i.e. SQ requires a background.
we live in a world where things are changing and when a change occurs in our lives we have to adjust with that. In the process of change, sometimes we go through stressful moments. these moments create a cycle of thoughts and these cycles are self-sustaining and consume our minds abilities. these negative thoughts are so powerful that they can cause anger, stress, mental depression or even suicidal tendencies.

 a person with lower SQ is unable to break these cycle of thoughts.

But a person with higher SQ can handle change easily and happiness or pain comes to her like nothing. she can understand that these changes are there to pass.

So how to raise the level of SQ.

can hobby be the solution?
Yes, that is why, since time immemorial, in every interview, hobby is a must question.

what I consider about hobbies is that

meditation can be the best hobby but it sucks.

the easiest hobby is talking and backbiting as it gives a sense of goodness or superiority,

universal hobbies are painting, music, shopping, writing, traveling, talking to strangers etc,

at times smoking and drinking socially can be a hobby,

killing others and sleeping can be a hobby, as these breaks the cycle of thoughts.

as per Gita -- the pleasure of senses, anger, and greed are the biggest of enemies of SQ or a blissful life.   

along with hobbies I discovered a very ancient practice to counter the changes in life and called it as ''fuck the world asan''.